🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to find the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.