🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive action to restrict social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate worldwide. Officials, campaigners, and guardians are watching closely to see if this strategy will become a template for countries abroad.

The European Momentum

In Europe, a rising group of nations are moving toward parallel restrictions.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister declaring that mobile devices and platforms are "taking away our kids' innocence". A law is expected to be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to protect children from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• The Irish government is developing a online verification tool to authenticate the age and identity of social media participants. Officials have suggested that an Australia-style ban remains "a potential measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has called on lawmakers to approve a proposal raising the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has endorsed a comparable move, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The administration in the Netherlands has advised families to restrict their kids from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has passed a symbolic motion demanding a ban for minors without parental consent is given. Even though it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these services, the move does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A clear age barrier is a good starting point," said one parliamentarian supporting the measure.

The UK: A Watchful Stance

In the UK, the administration has kept open a future ban, stating that "nothing is being dismissed" but maintaining any action must be "grounded in conclusive research".

Previously, momentum grew behind a proposal to introduce limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end watered down. Instead, the government committed to further research the issue.

Charities have voiced warnings. One foundation founded by the loved ones of a girl who died after encountering harmful online content argues that a blanket age ban might not protect children and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when users reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the Silicon Valley to create tools that are appropriate and suitable for children," said a influential online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Fragmented Picture

Across America, legislation is primarily occurring at the local government level due to country-wide stalemate.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a law banning under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it faces court battles.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a rule limiting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with additional time requiring a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also enacted laws demanding parental consent for teenagers to create social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from certain individuals to follow Australia's path, a nationwide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

International Perspectives

Outside of Europe and the US, additional nations are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the access age for one major platform to 16.

However, international organizations adopt a more cautious stance. A major UN agency has warned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "may even prove counterproductive". The body points out that online platforms can be a "critical link" for isolated youth and that bans should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

While this international debate continues, the policies of the Australian government and several other countries demonstrate that governments globally are less and less prepared to delay for tech companies to make changes on their own.